수능 기출 영어 지문 읽기
전체지문
There is evidence that even very simple algorithms can outperform expert judgement on simple prediction problems.
For example, algorithms have proved more accurate than humans in predicting whether a prisoner released on parole will go on to commit another crime, or in predicting whether a potential candidate will perform well in a job in future.
In over 100 studies across many different domains, half of all cases show simple formulas make better significant predictions than human experts, and the remainder (except a very small handful), show a tie between the two.
When there are a lot of different factors involved and a situation is very uncertain, simple formulas can win out by focusing on the most important factors and being consistent, while human judgement is too easily influenced by particularly salient and perhaps irrelevant considerations.
A similar idea is supported by further evidence that ‘checklists’ can improve the quality of expert decisions in a range of domains by ensuring that important steps or considerations aren’t missed when people are feeling overloaded.
For example, treating patients in intensive care can require hundreds of small actions per day, and one small error could cost a life.
Using checklists to ensure that no crucial steps are missed has proved to be remarkably effective in a range of medical contexts, from preventing live infections to reducing pneumonia.
수능 기출 영어 지문 쓰기
매우 간단한 알고리즘조차도 간단한 예측 문제에 대한 전문가의 판단을 능가할 수 있다는 증거가 있다.
T____ i_ e_______ t___ e___ v___ s_____ a_________ c__ o_________ e_____ j________ o_ s_____ p_________ p_______.
보기
There is evidence that even very simple algorithms can outperform expert judgement on simple prediction problems.
예를 들어, 가석방으로 풀려난 죄수가 계속해서 다른 범죄를 저지를 것인지 예측하거나, 잠재적인 후보자가 장차 직장에서 일을 잘할 것인지를 예측하는 데 알고리즘이 인간보다 더 정확하다는 것이 입증되었다.
F__ e______, a_________ h___ p_____ m___ a_______ t___ h_____ i_ p_________ w______ a p_______ r_______ o_ p_____ w___ g_ o_ t_ c_____ a______ c____, o_ i_ p_________ w______ a p________ c________ w___ p______ w___ i_ a j__ i_ f_____.
보기
For example, algorithms have proved more accurate than humans in predicting whether a prisoner released on parole will go on to commit another crime, or in predicting whether a potential candidate will perform well in a job in future.
많은 다른 영역에 걸친 100개가 넘는 연구에서, 모든 사례의 절반은 간단한 공식이 인간 전문가보다 중요한 예측을 더 잘하고, 그 나머지(아주 적은 소수를 제외하고)는 둘 사이의 무승부를 보여준다.
I_ o___ 100 s______ a_____ m___ d________ d______, h___ o_ a__ c____ s___ s_____ f_______ m___ b_____ s__________ p__________ t___ h____ e______, a__ t__ r________ (e_____ a v___ s____ h______), s___ a t__ b______ t__ t__.
보기
In over 100 studies across many different domains, half of all cases show simple formulas make better significant predictions than human experts, and the remainder (except a very small handful), show a tie between the two.
관련된 많은 다른 요인이 있고 상황이 매우 불확실할 때, 가장 중요한 요소에 초점을 맞추고 일관성을 유지함으로써 간단한 공식이 승리할 수 있는 반면, 인간의 판단은 특히 두드러지고 아마도 관련이 없는 고려 사항에 의해 너무 쉽게 영향을 받는다.
W___ t____ a__ a l__ o_ d________ f______ i_______ a__ a s________ i_ v___ u________, s_____ f_______ c__ w__ o__ b_ f_______ o_ t__ m___ i________ f______ a__ b____ c_________, w____ h____ j________ i_ t__ e_____ i_________ b_ p___________ s______ a__ p______ i_________ c_____________.
보기
When there are a lot of different factors involved and a situation is very uncertain, simple formulas can win out by focusing on the most important factors and being consistent, while human judgement is too easily influenced by particularly salient and perhaps irrelevant considerations.
사람들이 일이 너무 많다고 느낄 때 중요한 조치나 고려 사항을 놓치지 않도록 함으로써 ‘체크리스트’가 다양한 영역에서 전문가의 결정의 질을 향상할 수 있다는 추가적인 증거가 유사한 아이디어를 뒷받침한다.
A s______ i___ i_ s________ b_ f______ e_______ t___ ‘c_________’ c__ i______ t__ q______ o_ e_____ d________ i_ a r____ o_ d______ b_ e_______ t___ i________ s____ o_ c_____________ a___’_ m_____ w___ p_____ a__ f______ o_________.
보기
A similar idea is supported by further evidence that ‘checklists’ can improve the quality of expert decisions in a range of domains by ensuring that important steps or considerations aren’t missed when people are feeling overloaded.
예를 들어, 집중 치료 중인 환자를 치료하려면 하루에 수백 가지의 작은 조치가 필요할 수 있으며, 작은 실수 하나로 목숨을 잃게 할 수 있다.
F__ e______, t_______ p_______ i_ i________ c___ c__ r______ h_______ o_ s____ a______ p__ d__, a__ o__ s____ e____ c____ c___ a l___.
보기
For example, treating patients in intensive care can require hundreds of small actions per day, and one small error could cost a life.
어떠한 중요한 조치라도 놓치지 않기 위해 체크리스트를 사용하는 것은 당면한 감염을 예방하는 것에서부터 폐렴을 줄이는 것에 이르기까지 다양한 의학적 상황에서 현저하게 효과적이라는 것이 입증되었다.
U____ c_________ t_ e_____ t___ n_ c______ s____ a__ m_____ h__ p_____ t_ b_ r_________ e________ i_ a r____ o_ m______ c_______, f___ p_________ l___ i_________ t_ r_______ p________.
보기
Using checklists to ensure that no crucial steps are missed has proved to be remarkably effective in a range of medical contexts, from preventing live infections to reducing pneumonia.