수능 기출 영어 지문 읽기
전체지문
Managers of natural resources typically face market incentives that provide financial rewards for exploitation.
For example, owners of forest lands have a market incentive to cut down trees rather than manage the forest for carbon capture, wildlife habitat, flood protection, and other ecosystem services.
These services provide the owner with no financial benefits, and thus are unlikely to influence management decisions.
But the economic benefits provided by these services, based on their non-market values, may exceed the economic value of the timber.
For example, a United Nations initiative has estimated that the economic benefits of ecosystem services provided by tropical forests, including climate regulation, water purification, and erosion prevention, are over three times greater per hectare than the market benefits.
Thus cutting down the trees is economically inefficient, and markets are not sending the correct “signal” to favor ecosystem services over extractive uses.
수능 기출 영어 지문 쓰기
천연자원의 관리자는 일반적으로 이용에 대한 재정적 보상을 제공하는 시장 인센티브에 직면한다.
M_______ o_ n______ r________ t________ f___ m_____ i_________ t___ p______ f________ r______ f__ e___________.
보기
Managers of natural resources typically face market incentives that provide financial rewards for exploitation.
예를 들어, 삼림 지대의 소유자는 탄소 포집, 야생 동물 서식지, 홍수방어 및 다른 생태계 도움을 위해 숲을 관리하기보다는 나무를 베어내는 시장 인센티브를 가지고 있다.
F__ e______, o_____ o_ f_____ l____ h___ a m_____ i________ t_ c__ d___ t____ r_____ t___ m_____ t__ f_____ f__ c_____ c______, w_______ h______, f____ p_________, a__ o____ e________ s_______.
보기
For example, owners of forest lands have a market incentive to cut down trees rather than manage the forest for carbon capture, wildlife habitat, flood protection, and other ecosystem services.
이러한 (생태계) 도움은 소유자에게 어떠한 재정적 이익도 제공하지 않으므로, 관리 결정에 영향을 미칠 것 같지 않다.
T____ s_______ p______ t__ o____ w___ n_ f________ b_______, a__ t___ a__ u_______ t_ i________ m_________ d________.
보기
For example, owners of forest lands have a market incentive to cut down trees rather than manage the forest for carbon capture, wildlife habitat, flood protection, and other ecosystem services.
그러나 이러한 도움이 제공하는 경제적 이익은, 그것의 비시장적 가치에 근거하여, 목재의 경제적 가치를 초과할 수도 있다.
B__ t__ e_______ b_______ p_______ b_ t____ s_______, b____ o_ t____ n__-m_____ v_____, m__ e_____ t__ e_______ v____ o_ t__ t_____.
보기
But the economic benefits provided by these services, based on their non-market values, may exceed the economic value of the timber.
예를 들어, 유엔의 한 계획은 기후 조절, 수질 정화 및 침식 방지를 포함하여 열대 우림이 제공하는 생태계 도움의 경제적 이익이 시장 이익보다 헥타르당 3배보다 더 크다고 추정했다.
F__ e______, a U_____ N______ i_________ h__ e________ t___ t__ e_______ b_______ o_ e________ s_______ p_______ b_ t_______ f______, i________ c______ r_________, w____ p___________, a__ e______ p_________, a__ o___ t____ t____ g______ p__ h______ t___ t__ m_____ b_______.
보기
For example, a United Nations initiative has estimated that the economic benefits of ecosystem services provided by tropical forests, including climate regulation, water purification, and erosion prevention, are over three times greater per hectare than the market benefits.
따라서 나무를 베는 것은 경제적으로 비효율적인데, 시장은 채취하는 사용보다 생태계 도움을 선호하게 하는 올바른 ‘신호’를 보내지 않고 있다.
T___ c______ d___ t__ t____ i_ e___________ i__________, a__ m______ a__ n__ s______ t__ c______ “s_____” t_ f____ e________ s_______ o___ e_________ u___.
보기
Thus cutting down the trees is economically inefficient, and markets are not sending the correct “signal” to favor ecosystem services over extractive uses.