수능 기출 영어 지문 읽기
전체지문
Precision and determinacy are a necessary requirement for all meaningful scientific debate, and progress in the sciences is, to a large extent, the ongoing process of achieving ever greater precision.
But historical representation puts a premium on a proliferation of representations, hence not on the refinement of one representation but on the production of an ever more varied set of representations.
Historical insight is not a matter of a continuous “narrowing down” of previous options, not of an approximation of the truth, but, on the contrary, is an “explosion” of possible points of view.
It therefore aims at the unmasking of previous illusions of determinacy and precision by the production of new and alternative representations, rather than at achieving truth by a careful analysis of what was right and wrong in those previous representations.
And from this perspective, the development of historical insight may indeed be regarded by the outsider as a process of creating ever more confusion, a continuous questioning of certainty and precision seemingly achieved already, rather than, as in the sciences, an ever greater approximation to the truth.
수능 기출 영어 지문 쓰기
정확성과 확정성은 모든 의미 있는 과학 토론을 위한 필요조건이며, 과학에서의 발전은 상당 부분, 훨씬 더 높은 정확성을 달성하는 계속 진행 중인 과정이다.
P________ a__ d__________ a__ a n________ r__________ f__ a__ m_________ s_________ d_____, a__ p_______ i_ t__ s_______ i_, t_ a l____ e_____, t__ o______ p______ o_ a________ e___ g______ p________.
보기
Precision and determinacy are a necessary requirement for all meaningful scientific debate, and progress in the sciences is, to a large extent, the ongoing process of achieving ever greater precision.
그러나 역사적 진술은 진술의 증식을 중요시하는데, 이는 한 가지 진술의 정제가 아닌, 훨씬 더 다양한 진술 집합의 생성에 중요성을 두는 것이다.
B__ h_________ r_____________ p___ a p______ o_ a p____________ o_ r______________, h____ n__ o_ t__ r_________ o_ o__ r_____________ b__ o_ t__ p_________ o_ a_ e___ m___ v_____ s__ o_ r______________.
보기
But historical representation puts a premium on a proliferation of representations, hence not on the refinement of one representation but on the production of an ever more varied set of representations.
역사적 통찰은 이전에 선택한 것들을 지속해서 ‘좁혀 가는’ 것의 문제, 즉 진리에 근접함의 문제가 아니라, 반대로 가능한 관점들의 ‘폭발적 증가’이다.
H_________ i______ i_ n__ a m_____ o_ a c_________ “n________ d___” o_ p_______ o______, n__ o_ a_ a____________ o_ t__ t____, b__, o_ t__ c_______, i_ a_ “e________” o_ p_______ p_____ o_ v___.
보기
Historical insight is not a matter of a continuous “narrowing down” of previous options, not of an approximation of the truth, but, on the contrary, is an “explosion” of possible points of view.
그러므로 그것은 이전의 진술에서 무엇이 옳고 틀렸는지에 대한 신중한 분석에 의해 진리를 획득하는 것이 아니라, 새롭고 대안적인 진술의 생성에 의해 확정성과 정확성에 대해 이전에 가진 환상의 정체를 드러내는 것을 목표로 한다.
I_ t________ a___ a_ t__ u________ o_ p_______ i________ o_ d__________ a__ p________ b_ t__ p_________ o_ n__ a__ a__________ r______________, r_____ t___ a_ a________ t____ b_ a c______ a_______ o_ w___ w__ r____ a__ w____ i_ t____ p_______ r______________.
보기
It therefore aims at the unmasking of previous illusions of determinacy and precision by the production of new and alternative representations, rather than at achieving truth by a careful analysis of what was right and wrong in those previous representations.
그리고 이러한 관점에서 보면, 역사적 통찰의 발전은 과학에서처럼 진리에 훨씬 더 많이 근접함보다는, 훨씬 더 큰 혼란을 만들어내는 과정, 즉 이미 획득한 것처럼 보이는 확실성과 정확성에 대한 지속적인 의문 제기로 외부인에게 진정 여겨질 수도 있다.
A__ f___ t___ p__________, t__ d__________ o_ h_________ i______ m__ i_____ b_ r_______ b_ t__ o_______ a_ a p______ o_ c_______ e___ m___ c________, a c_________ q__________ o_ c________ a__ p________ s________ a_______ a______, r_____ t___, a_ i_ t__ s_______, a_ e___ g______ a____________ t_ t__ t____.
보기
And from this perspective, the development of historical insight may indeed be regarded by the outsider as a process of creating ever more confusion, a continuous questioning of certainty and precision seemingly achieved already, rather than, as in the sciences, an ever greater approximation to the truth.